We've shipped mobile apps every way they can be shipped. Native iOS in Swift and Objective-C. Native Android in Kotlin and Java. Hybrid in Flutter, React Native, and Capacitor. App Store submissions, Google Play submissions, enterprise MDM rollouts — we've done them all, and we know which one fits your project before you do. Competitive rates, fast turnaround, ready to start.
The right architecture depends on what the app needs to do, how fast you need it shipped, and what budget you're working with. We've built every kind of mobile app there is — so we can tell you honestly which approach fits before you commit. Then we ship it.
Swift for new builds, Objective-C when the legacy codebase calls for it. SwiftUI for modern interfaces, UIKit when we need finer control. We've shipped to every iOS version Apple still supports — including the platform-specific pieces hybrid frameworks can't touch: Apple Pay, Face ID, ARKit, Core ML, secure enclave integration.
Kotlin first, Java when the existing codebase needs it. Jetpack Compose for the new generation of Android UI, classic XML layouts when we're maintaining or extending a mature app. Tight integration with Google Pay, biometrics, Android Keystore, foreground services, and the Android-only OEM features that matter for payment hardware.
Flutter when you want one codebase shipping to both stores with near-native performance. React Native when your team already speaks JavaScript. Capacitor for content-heavy apps that lean on a web stack. We pick the framework that survives your three-year roadmap, not just your launch deadline.
Hybrid builds typically run 40–60% below the cost of building twice natively — and for most consumer and enterprise apps, the user experience is indistinguishable. Where you need native (high-performance graphics, deep hardware integration), we say so. Where hybrid works, we save you the money. Either way, our rates are competitive and our timelines are short.
Building the app is one project. Getting it approved, distributed, updated, and rolled out across an enterprise fleet is another. We handle both. Apple's review process, Google's policy nuances, enterprise MDM rollouts — we've been through all of it enough times to know where the rejections come from before they happen.
App Store Connect submissions, TestFlight beta distribution, App Privacy disclosures, App Tracking Transparency, IAP setup. We know what gets rejected and how to fix it before you submit.
Play Console submissions, staged rollouts, internal testing tracks, Play Asset Delivery, target API compliance, Data Safety form, and the policy minefield Google updates twice a year — navigated.
Custom Apps for B2B distribution, Volume Purchase Program, managed Apple IDs, custom B2B redemption codes. The enterprise distribution path that bypasses the public store entirely — we've shipped through it.
Private app distribution, managed configurations, organization-only listings. The Android equivalent of Apple Business Manager — and the path most enterprise rollouts actually run on.
Microsoft Intune, VMware Workspace ONE, Jamf, MobileIron, Hexnode, SimpleMDM, SOTI — we've packaged and deployed apps through all of them. Managed configurations, kiosk mode, app supervision, zero-touch enrollment.
Certificate management, provisioning profiles, app signing keys, ProGuard / R8 obfuscation, app integrity attestation, certificate pinning. The unglamorous infrastructure that keeps production apps secure and approvable.
The work that takes most mobile shops six months takes us two. The rates we charge are a fraction of what a comparable native-only studio would quote. And our familiarity with both stores and the major MDM platforms means we don't burn project time on the bureaucracy — we get apps approved, deployed, and into production hands without the back-and-forth that kills launch dates. Speed, cost, and shipping discipline. Pick all three.
Most shops have a religion about this. We don't. We've shipped both paths enough times to know which one fits which problem — and the answer changes based on what you're trying to do, not what we'd prefer to build.
The app is content-heavy, the audience uses both platforms about equally, native UX patterns aren't a deal-breaker, and shipping fast matters more than squeezing the last 10% of performance. That's the sweet spot for Flutter or React Native — one codebase, both stores, faster & cheaper.
The app does heavy lifting on the device — ARKit, ML inference, hardware integration, payment terminal control, deep camera or biometric work. Or the audience is 90%+ on one platform. Or the UX has to feel native enough that users don't notice the difference. Then native wins.
A small number of projects warrant a hybrid shell with native modules for the performance-critical pieces. Most don't. We'll tell you honestly during scoping which camp your project falls into — and you'll save real money either way.
Tell us about the app. We'll come back with an honest recommendation on native vs. hybrid, a fixed-price scope, and a realistic timeline — usually within 24 hours. You'll hear back from an engineer, not a sales rep.
Tell us about your project. We'll recommend native, hybrid, or a mix — and come back with a fixed price, a timeline, and a plan for the store submissions or MDM rollout. Free, no obligation, usually within 24 hours.